↓ Skip to main content

The Eye is Listening: Music-Induced Arousal and Individual Differences Predict Pupillary Responses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Eye is Listening: Music-Induced Arousal and Individual Differences Predict Pupillary Responses
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Gingras, Manuela M. Marin, Estela Puig-Waldmüller, W. T. Fitch

Abstract

Pupillary responses are a well-known indicator of emotional arousal but have not yet been systematically investigated in response to music. Here, we measured pupillary dilations evoked by short musical excerpts normalized for intensity and selected for their stylistic uniformity. Thirty participants (15 females) provided subjective ratings of music-induced felt arousal, tension, pleasantness, and familiarity for 80 classical music excerpts. The pupillary responses evoked by these excerpts were measured in another thirty participants (15 females). We probed the role of listener-specific characteristics such as mood, stress reactivity, self-reported role of music in life, liking for the selected excerpts, as well as of subjective responses to music, in pupillary responses. Linear mixed model analyses showed that a greater role of music in life was associated with larger dilations, and that larger dilations were also predicted for excerpts rated as more arousing or tense. However, an interaction between arousal and liking for the excerpts suggested that pupillary responses were modulated less strongly by arousal when the excerpts were particularly liked. An analogous interaction was observed between tension and liking. Additionally, males exhibited larger dilations than females. Overall, these findings suggest a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down influences on pupillary responses to music.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 33%
Neuroscience 17 11%
Arts and Humanities 13 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2020.
All research outputs
#310,133
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#145
of 7,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,287
of 289,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.