The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Functional connectome fingerprint: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudinei E. Biazoli, Giovanni A. Salum, Pedro M. Pan, André Zugman, Edson Amaro, Luis A. Rohde, Euripedes C. Miguel, Andrea P. Jackowski, Rodrigo A. Bressan, João R. Sato |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,046,664
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,306
of 7,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,789
of 420,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#118
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.