↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Bridging the Theories of Affordances and Limb Apraxia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Bridging the Theories of Affordances and Limb Apraxia
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonello Pellicano, Anna M. Borghi, Ferdinand Binkofski

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Professor 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 24%
Social Sciences 6 16%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,420,684
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,984
of 7,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,878
of 308,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#117
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.