The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review of Investigations into Functional Brain Connectivity Following Spinal Cord Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00517 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alkinoos Athanasiou, Manousos A. Klados, Niki Pandria, Nicolas Foroglou, Kyriaki R. Kavazidi, Konstantinos Polyzoidis, Panagiotis D. Bamidis |
| Abstract |
Background: Complete or incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) results in varying degree of motor, sensory and autonomic impairment. Long-lasting, often irreversible disability results from disconnection of efferent and afferent pathways. How does this disconnection affect brain function is not so clear. Changes in brain organization and structure have been associated with SCI and have been extensively studied and reviewed. Yet, our knowledge regarding brain connectivity changes following SCI is overall lacking. Methods: In this study we conduct a systematic review of articles regarding investigations of functional brain networks following SCI, searching on PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect according to PRISMA-P 2015 statement standards. Results: Changes in brain connectivity have been shown even during the early stages of the chronic condition and correlate with the degree of neurological impairment. Connectivity changes appear as dynamic post-injury procedures. Sensorimotor networks of patients and healthy individuals share similar patterns but new functional interactions have been identified as unique to SCI networks. Conclusions: Large-scale, multi-modal, longitudinal studies on SCI patients are needed to understand how brain network reorganization is established and progresses through the course of the condition. The expected insight holds clinical relevance in preventing maladaptive plasticity after SCI through individualized neurorehabilitation, as well as the design of connectivity-based brain-computer interfaces and assistive technologies for SCI patients. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 29% |
| Engineering | 10 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,804,243
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,127
of 7,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,563
of 329,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#47
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.