↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Pro- and Re-Active Driving Behavior by Means of the EEG

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating Pro- and Re-Active Driving Behavior by Means of the EEG
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund Wascher, Stefan Arnau, Ingmar Gutberlet, Melanie Karthaus, Stephan Getzmann

Abstract

Traffic safety essentially depends on the drivers' alertness and vigilance, especially in monotonous or demanding driving situations. Brain oscillatory EEG activity offers insight into a drivers' mental state and has therefore attracted much attention in the past. However, EEG measures do not only vary with internal factors like attentional engagement and vigilance but might also interact with external factors like time on task, task demands, or the degree to which a traffic situation is predictable. In order to identify EEG parameters for cognitive mechanisms involved in tasks of high and low controllability, the present study investigated the interaction of time on task, task load, and cognitive controllability in simulated driving scenarios, using an either re-active or pro-active driving task. Participants performed a lane-keeping task, half of them compensating varying levels of crosswind (re-active task), and the other half driving along a winding road (pro-active task). Both driving tasks were adjusted with respect to difficulty. The analysis of oscillatory EEG parameters showed an increase in total power (1-30 Hz) with time on task, with decreasing task load, and in the re-active compared to the pro-active task. Furthermore, the relative power in Alpha band increased with decreasing task load and time on task, while relative Theta power showed the opposite pattern. Moreover, relative Alpha power was also higher in the re-active, than pro-active, driving situation, an effect that even increased with time on task. The results demonstrate that the controllability of a driving situation has a similar effect on oscillatory EEG activity like time on task and task load.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 23%
Psychology 10 19%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,035,612
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,881
of 7,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,116
of 330,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#46
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.