↓ Skip to main content

Constraint-Free Natural Image Reconstruction From fMRI Signals Based on Convolutional Neural Network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constraint-Free Natural Image Reconstruction From fMRI Signals Based on Convolutional Neural Network
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi Zhang, Kai Qiao, Linyuan Wang, Li Tong, Ying Zeng, Bin Yan

Abstract

In recent years, research on decoding brain activity based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has made eye-catching achievements. However, constraint-free natural image reconstruction from brain activity remains a challenge, as specifying brain activity for all possible images is impractical. The problem was often simplified by using semantic prior information or just reconstructing simple images, including digitals and letters. Without semantic prior information, we present a novel method to reconstruct natural images from the fMRI signals of human visual cortex based on the computation model of convolutional neural network (CNN). First, we extracted the unit output of viewed natural images in each layer of a pre-trained CNN as CNN features. Second, we transformed image reconstruction from fMRI signals into the problem of CNN feature visualization by training a sparse linear regression to map from the fMRI patterns to CNN features. By iteratively optimization to find the matched image, whose CNN unit features become most similar to those predicted from the brain activity, we finally achieved the promising results for the challenging constraint-free natural image reconstruction. The semantic prior information of the stimuli was not used when training decoding model, and any category of images (not constraint by the training set) could be reconstructed theoretically. We found that the reconstructed images resembled the natural stimuli, especially in position and shape. The experimental results suggest that hierarchical visual features may be an effective tool to express the human visual processing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 26%
Computer Science 9 15%
Engineering 9 15%
Psychology 4 7%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,409,968
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,605
of 7,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,850
of 328,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#98
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.