↓ Skip to main content

You Are What You (First) Eat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
You Are What You (First) Eat
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly L. Buchanan, Diego V. Bohórquez

Abstract

As far back as we can remember, we eat. In fact, we eat before we can remember. Our first meal is amniotic fluid. We swallow it during the first trimester of gestation, and with that, we expose our gut to a universe of molecules. These early molecules have a profound influence on gut and brain function. For example, the taste of the amniotic fluid changes based on the mother's diet. Indeed, recent findings suggest that food preferences begin in utero. Likewise, a baby's first exposure to bacteria, previously thought to be during birth, appears to be in utero as well. And just as postnatal food and microbiota are implicated in brain function and dysfunction, prenatal nutrients and microbes may have a long-lasting impact on the development of the gut-brain neural circuits processing food, especially considering their plasticity during this vulnerable period. Here, we use current literature to put forward concepts needed to understand how the gut first meets the brain, and how this encounter may help us remember food.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 36 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 39 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,224,877
of 26,451,336 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,456
of 7,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,093
of 344,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#25
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,336 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.