The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Time Perception and Dysfunction: Clinical and Practical Implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00435 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deana Davalos, Giovanna Mioni, Simon Grondin, Felipe Ortuño |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Denmark | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Greece | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 27% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,198,067
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,532
of 7,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,640
of 350,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#34
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.