↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Working Memory Training in Healthy Young Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Working Memory Training in Healthy Young Adults
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yufeng Ke, Ningci Wang, Jiale Du, Linghan Kong, Shuang Liu, Minpeng Xu, Xingwei An, Dong Ming

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 19%
Neuroscience 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 73 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,401,218
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,859
of 7,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,805
of 438,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#57
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.