↓ Skip to main content

Rebound or Entrainment? The Influence of Alternating Current Stimulation on Individual Alpha

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rebound or Entrainment? The Influence of Alternating Current Stimulation on Individual Alpha
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linus Haberbosch, Sein Schmidt, Andreas Jooss, Arvid Köhn, Leonard Kozarzewski, Maria Rönnefarth, Michael Scholz, Stephan A. Brandt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 27%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,822,662
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,797
of 7,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,021
of 454,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#61
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.