The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cerebral Perfusion Monitoring Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy During Head-Up Tilt Table Test in Patients With Orthostatic Intolerance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoo Hwan Kim, Seung-ho Paik, Zephaniah Phillips, Nam-Joon Jeon, Byung-Jo Kim, Beop-Min Kim |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,943,510
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,897
of 7,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,367
of 356,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#104
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.