↓ Skip to main content

Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joost Meekes, Stefan Debener, Catharina Zich, Martin G. Bleichner, Cornelia Kranczioch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 21%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,898,678
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,846
of 7,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,667
of 353,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#38
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.