The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immersive Virtual Reality as an Adjunctive Non-opioid Analgesic for Pre-dominantly Latin American Children With Large Severe Burn Wounds During Burn Wound Cleaning in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hunter G. Hoffman, Robert A. Rodriguez, Miriam Gonzalez, Mary Bernardy, Raquel Peña, Wanda Beck, David R. Patterson, Walter J. Meyer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 108 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 10% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 109 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,050,105
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,948
of 7,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,309
of 345,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#77
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.