You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Theories and Methods for Labeling Cognitive Workload: Classification and Transfer Learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00295 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan McKendrick, Bradley Feest, Amanda Harwood, Brian Falcone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 16% |
| Engineering | 12 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,290,102
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,736
of 7,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,274
of 354,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#49
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.