You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Neurophysiological Measures Can be Used to Enhance the Evaluation of Remote Tower Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00303 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pietro Aricò, Maxime Reynal, Gianluca Di Flumeri, Gianluca Borghini, Nicolina Sciaraffa, Jean-Paul Imbert, Christophe Hurter, Michela Terenzi, Ana Ferreira, Simone Pozzi, Viviana Betti, Matteo Marucci, Alexandru C. Telea, Fabio Babiloni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 10 | 17% |
| Engineering | 9 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#23,545,139
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7,044
of 7,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,950
of 353,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#105
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.