↓ Skip to main content

Co-adaptive Training Improves Efficacy of a Multi-Day EEG-Based Motor Imagery BCI Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-adaptive Training Improves Efficacy of a Multi-Day EEG-Based Motor Imagery BCI Training
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amjad Abu-Rmileh, Eyal Zakkay, Lior Shmuelof, Oren Shriki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 23%
Computer Science 5 11%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,687,862
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,954
of 7,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,107
of 372,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#58
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.