The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neural Networks Supporting Phoneme Monitoring Are Modulated by Phonology but Not Lexicality or Iconicity: Evidence From British and Swedish Sign Language
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00374 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary Rudner, Eleni Orfanidou, Lena Kästner, Velia Cardin, Bencie Woll, Cheryl M. Capek, Jerker Rönnberg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 13% |
Linguistics | 2 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,802,881
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,986
of 7,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,073
of 376,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#26
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.