↓ Skip to main content

Maintenance Versus Transmission Deficits: The Effect of Delay on Naming Performance in Aphasia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maintenance Versus Transmission Deficits: The Effect of Delay on Naming Performance in Aphasia
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Martin, Gary S. Dell

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Psychology 6 19%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Linguistics 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,326,463
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,588
of 7,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,869
of 459,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#35
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.