The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feedback-Related Negativity and Frontal Midline Theta Reflect Dissociable Processing of Reinforcement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00452 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Rawls, Vladimir Miskovic, Shannin N. Moody, Yoojin Lee, Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff, Connie Lamm |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 15 | 27% |
| Psychology | 14 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,654,578
of 26,491,397 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,138
of 7,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,677
of 484,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#51
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,491,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.