↓ Skip to main content

Contact Heat Evoked Potentials Are Responsive to Peripheral Sensitization: Requisite Stimulation Parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contact Heat Evoked Potentials Are Responsive to Peripheral Sensitization: Requisite Stimulation Parameters
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas D. Linde, Jenny Haefeli, Catherine R. Jutzeler, Jan Rosner, Jessica McDougall, Armin Curt, John L. K. Kramer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#21,049,801
of 26,744,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,175
of 7,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,897
of 484,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#83
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.