↓ Skip to main content

Physics-Based Simulations to Predict the Differential Effects of Motor Control and Musculoskeletal Deficits on Gait Dysfunction in Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physics-Based Simulations to Predict the Differential Effects of Motor Control and Musculoskeletal Deficits on Gait Dysfunction in Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Case Study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Falisse, Lorenzo Pitto, Hans Kainz, Hoa Hoang, Mariska Wesseling, Sam Van Rossom, Eirini Papageorgiou, Lynn Bar-On, Ann Hallemans, Kaat Desloovere, Guy Molenaers, Anja Van Campenhout, Friedl De Groote, Ilse Jonkers

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 53 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 67 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#23,849,611
of 26,547,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7,104
of 7,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,708
of 387,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#122
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,547,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.