The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Neurophysiological Responses of Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00306 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Scott, Dawson J. Kidgell, Ashlyn K. Frazer, Alan J. Pearce |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,456,535
of 24,407,785 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,986
of 7,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,817
of 403,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#39
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,407,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.