The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brain Vital Signs Detect Information Processing Differences When Neuromodulation Is Used During Cognitive Skills Training
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00358 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher J. Smith, Ashley Livingstone, Shaun D. Fickling, Pamela Tannouri, Natasha K.J. Campbell, Bimal Lakhani, Yuri Danilov, Jonathan M. Sackier, Ryan C.N. D’Arcy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 33% |
France | 1 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 6 | 17% |
Psychology | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,774,787
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,154
of 7,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,562
of 402,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#42
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.