↓ Skip to main content

N-Back Related ERPs Depend on Stimulus Type, Task Structure, Pre-processing, and Lab Factors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
N-Back Related ERPs Depend on Stimulus Type, Task Structure, Pre-processing, and Lab Factors
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2020.549966
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahsa Alizadeh Shalchy, Valentina Pergher, Anja Pahor, Marc M. Van Hulle, Aaron R. Seitz

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 27%
Psychology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,318,370
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,084
of 7,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,899
of 420,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#61
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.