The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder Share Similar Neural Mechanisms of Decision-Making Under Ambiguous Circumstances?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.585086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yudan Luo, Lu Chen, Hongchen Li, Yi Dong, Xiaoqin Zhou, Linlin Qiu, Lei Zhang, Yaxiang Gao, Chunyan Zhu, Fengqiong Yu, Kai Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,629,584
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,179
of 7,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,355
of 444,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#80
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.