↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Factors and Models for Changes in Cognitive Performance After Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic Factors and Models for Changes in Cognitive Performance After Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2021.636355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandy Roheger, Hannah Liebermann-Jordanidis, Fabian Krohm, Anne Adams, Elke Kalbe

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,314
of 7,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,576
of 437,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#63
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.