↓ Skip to main content

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Does Not Affect Sports People’s Explosive Power: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Does Not Affect Sports People’s Explosive Power: A Pilot Study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2021.640609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreina Giustiniani, Giuseppe Battaglia, Giuseppe Messina, Hely Morello, Salvatore Guastella, Angelo Iovane, Massimiliano Oliveri, Antonio Palma, Patrizia Proia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#18,143,395
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,773
of 7,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,440
of 437,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#124
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.