↓ Skip to main content

Case Report: GPi DBS for Non-parkinsonian Midline Tremor: A Normative Connectomic Comparison to a Failed Thalamic DBS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case Report: GPi DBS for Non-parkinsonian Midline Tremor: A Normative Connectomic Comparison to a Failed Thalamic DBS
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2021.709552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Morishita, Yuki Sakai, Takayasu Mishima, George Umemoto, Michael S. Okun, Saori C. Tanaka, Yoshio Tsuboi, Tooru Inoue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,712,706
of 26,439,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,466
of 7,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,470
of 444,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#46
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,439,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.