You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Virtual Reality Training More Effective Than Traditional Physical Training on Balance and Functional Mobility in Healthy Older Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2022.843481 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meng Liu, Kaixiang Zhou, Yan Chen, Limingfei Zhou, Dapeng Bao, Junhong Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,085,362
of 26,192,167 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,387
of 7,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,055
of 452,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#19
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,192,167 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.