The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Skin and Mechanoreceptor Contribution to Tactile Input for Perception: A Review of Simulation Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2022.862344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Deflorio, Massimiliano Di Luca, Alan M. Wing |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,445,092
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,917
of 7,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,107
of 451,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#25
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.