You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How standardized are “standard protocols”? Variations in protocol and performance evaluation for slow cortical potential neurofeedback: A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2022.887504 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John Hasslinger, Micaela Meregalli, Sven Bölte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,963,917
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,885
of 7,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,158
of 433,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#88
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.