↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of consciousness rehabilitation via neuroimaging methods

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of consciousness rehabilitation via neuroimaging methods
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1233499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianyang Wang, Xinyu Gao, Zuchao Xiang, Fangfang Sun, Yong Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,860,880
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7,007
of 7,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,075
of 352,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#82
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.