The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of rhythmic visual cues on cortical activation and functional connectivity features during stepping: an fNIRS study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1337504 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiajia Wu, Huilin Zhou, Hao Chen, Wensong Jiang, Xuelian Wang, Tao Meng, Chaowen Wu, Li Li, Yuemin Wu, Weinv Fan, Changcheng Shi, Guokun Zuo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,781,438
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,960
of 7,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,773
of 226,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#54
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.