You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Recalibrating single-study effect sizes using hierarchical Bayesian models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroimaging, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnimg.2023.1138193 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhipeng Cao, Matthew McCabe, Peter Callas, Renata B. Cupertino, Jonatan Ottino-González, Alistair Murphy, Devarshi Pancholi, Nathan Schwab, Orr Catherine, Kent Hutchison, Janna Cousijn, Alain Dagher, John J. Foxe, Anna E. Goudriaan, Robert Hester, Chiang-Shan R. Li, Wesley K. Thompson, Angelica M. Morales, Edythe D. London, Valentina Lorenzetti, Maartje Luijten, Rocio Martin-Santos, Reza Momenan, Martin P. Paulus, Lianne Schmaal, Rajita Sinha, Nadia Solowij, Dan J. Stein, Elliot A. Stein, Anne Uhlmann, Ruth J. van Holst, Dick J. Veltman, Reinout W. Wiers, Murat Yücel, Sheng Zhang, Patricia Conrod, Scott Mackey, Hugh Garavan, The ENIGMA Addiction Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 2 | 22% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,944,096
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroimaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,017
of 367,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroimaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them