↓ Skip to main content

Granger causality is designed to measure effect, not mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granger causality is designed to measure effect, not mechanism
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2013.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam B. Barrett, Lionel Barnett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Master 10 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 20%
Neuroscience 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Computer Science 6 10%
Mathematics 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,972,649
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#378
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,997
of 288,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.