↓ Skip to main content

HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
749 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
842 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas V. Wiecki, Imri Sofer, Michael J. Frank

Abstract

The diffusion model is a commonly used tool to infer latent psychological processes underlying decision-making, and to link them to neural mechanisms based on response times. Although efficient open source software has been made available to quantitatively fit the model to data, current estimation methods require an abundance of response time measurements to recover meaningful parameters, and only provide point estimates of each parameter. In contrast, hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation methods are useful for enhancing statistical power, allowing for simultaneous estimation of individual subject parameters and the group distribution that they are drawn from, while also providing measures of uncertainty in these parameters in the posterior distribution. Here, we present a novel Python-based toolbox called HDDM (hierarchical drift diffusion model), which allows fast and flexible estimation of the the drift-diffusion model and the related linear ballistic accumulator model. HDDM requires fewer data per subject/condition than non-hierarchical methods, allows for full Bayesian data analysis, and can handle outliers in the data. Finally, HDDM supports the estimation of how trial-by-trial measurements (e.g., fMRI) influence decision-making parameters. This paper will first describe the theoretical background of the drift diffusion model and Bayesian inference. We then illustrate usage of the toolbox on a real-world data set from our lab. Finally, parameter recovery studies show that HDDM beats alternative fitting methods like the χ(2)-quantile method as well as maximum likelihood estimation. The software and documentation can be downloaded at: http://ski.clps.brown.edu/hddm_docs/

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 842 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 811 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 204 24%
Researcher 149 18%
Student > Master 103 12%
Student > Bachelor 76 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 118 14%
Unknown 149 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 306 36%
Neuroscience 145 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 5%
Computer Science 28 3%
Engineering 28 3%
Other 84 10%
Unknown 207 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,214,056
of 24,832,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#77
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,346
of 292,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,832,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.