↓ Skip to main content

Automatic analysis (aa): efficient neuroimaging workflows and parallel processing using Matlab and XML

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automatic analysis (aa): efficient neuroimaging workflows and parallel processing using Matlab and XML
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhodri Cusack, Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky, Daniel J. Mitchell, Conor J. Wild, Tibor Auer, Annika C. Linke, Jonathan E. Peelle

Abstract

Recent years have seen neuroimaging data sets becoming richer, with larger cohorts of participants, a greater variety of acquisition techniques, and increasingly complex analyses. These advances have made data analysis pipelines complicated to set up and run (increasing the risk of human error) and time consuming to execute (restricting what analyses are attempted). Here we present an open-source framework, automatic analysis (aa), to address these concerns. Human efficiency is increased by making code modular and reusable, and managing its execution with a processing engine that tracks what has been completed and what needs to be (re)done. Analysis is accelerated by optional parallel processing of independent tasks on cluster or cloud computing resources. A pipeline comprises a series of modules that each perform a specific task. The processing engine keeps track of the data, calculating a map of upstream and downstream dependencies for each module. Existing modules are available for many analysis tasks, such as SPM-based fMRI preprocessing, individual and group level statistics, voxel-based morphometry, tractography, and multi-voxel pattern analyses (MVPA). However, aa also allows for full customization, and encourages efficient management of code: new modules may be written with only a small code overhead. aa has been used by more than 50 researchers in hundreds of neuroimaging studies comprising thousands of subjects. It has been found to be robust, fast, and efficient, for simple-single subject studies up to multimodal pipelines on hundreds of subjects. It is attractive to both novice and experienced users. aa can reduce the amount of time neuroimaging laboratories spend performing analyses and reduce errors, expanding the range of scientific questions it is practical to address.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 128 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 21%
Neuroscience 25 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Engineering 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,183,110
of 24,612,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#78
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,054
of 390,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,612,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.