↓ Skip to main content

Parameter estimation of neuron models using in-vitro and in-vivo electrophysiological data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parameter estimation of neuron models using in-vitro and in-vivo electrophysiological data
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2015.00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eoin P. Lynch, Conor J. Houghton

Abstract

Spiking neuron models can accurately predict the response of neurons to somatically injected currents if the model parameters are carefully tuned. Predicting the response of in-vivo neurons responding to natural stimuli presents a far more challenging modeling problem. In this study, an algorithm is presented for parameter estimation of spiking neuron models. The algorithm is a hybrid evolutionary algorithm which uses a spike train metric as a fitness function. We apply this to parameter discovery in modeling two experimental data sets with spiking neurons; in-vitro current injection responses from a regular spiking pyramidal neuron are modeled using spiking neurons and in-vivo extracellular auditory data is modeled using a two stage model consisting of a stimulus filter and spiking neuron model.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 37%
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 22%
Engineering 12 18%
Computer Science 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Physics and Astronomy 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,163,074
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#478
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,244
of 264,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.