↓ Skip to main content

Visualization, Interaction and Tractometry: Dealing with Millions of Streamlines from Diffusion MRI Tractography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visualization, Interaction and Tractometry: Dealing with Millions of Streamlines from Diffusion MRI Tractography
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2017.00042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francois Rheault, Jean-Christophe Houde, Maxime Descoteaux

Abstract

Recently proposed tractography and connectomics approaches often require a very large number of streamlines, in the order of millions. Generating, storing and interacting with these datasets is currently quite difficult, since they require a lot of space in memory and processing time. Compression is a common approach to reduce data size. Recently such an approach has been proposed consisting in removing collinear points in the streamlines. Removing points from streamlines results in files that cannot be robustly post-processed and interacted with existing tools, which are for the most part point-based. The aim of this work is to improve visualization, interaction and tractometry algorithms to robustly handle compressed tractography datasets. Our proposed improvements are threefold: (i) An efficient loading procedure to improve visualization (reduce memory usage up to 95% for a 0.2 mm step size); (ii) interaction techniques robust to compressed tractograms; (iii) tractometry techniques robust to compressed tractograms to eliminate biased in tract-based statistics. The present work demonstrates the need of correctly handling compressed streamlines to avoid biases in future tractometry and connectomics studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 36%
Computer Science 6 14%
Psychology 4 9%
Engineering 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,660,808
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#295
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,220
of 329,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.