The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An interactive image segmentation method for the anatomical structures of the main olfactory bulb with micro-level resolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fninf.2023.1276891 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Liu, Anan Li, Yue Luo, Shengda Bao, Tao Jiang, Xiangning Li, Jing Yuan, Zhao Feng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,970,821
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#606
of 852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,354
of 379,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.