The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rodent Versions of the Iowa Gambling Task: Opportunities and Challenges for the Understanding of Decision-Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2011.00109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonie de Visser, Judith R. Homberg, Manuela Mitsogiannis, Fiona D. Zeeb, Marion Rivalan, Aurélie Fitoussi, Vasco Galhardo, Ruud van den Bos, Catherine A. Winstanley, Françoise Dellu-Hagedorn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 19% |
| Researcher | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 73 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 49 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,631
of 11,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,014
of 197,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#63
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.