↓ Skip to main content

Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
894 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Keng Ang, Zheng Yang Chin, Chuanchu Wang, Cuntai Guan, Haihong Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 497 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 24%
Student > Master 109 21%
Student > Bachelor 41 8%
Researcher 37 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 4%
Other 58 11%
Unknown 121 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 185 36%
Computer Science 94 18%
Neuroscience 42 8%
Psychology 10 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 2%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 143 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,669,187
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#832
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,159
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#15
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.