↓ Skip to main content

Decision Making and Behavioral Choice during Predator Avoidance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision Making and Behavioral Choice during Predator Avoidance
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Herberholz, Gregory D. Marquart

Abstract

One of the most important decisions animals have to make is how to respond to an attack from a potential predator. The response must be prompt and appropriate to ensure survival. Invertebrates have been important models in studying the underlying neurobiology of the escape response due to their accessible nervous systems and easily quantifiable behavioral output. Moreover, invertebrates provide opportunities for investigating these processes at a level of analysis not available in most other organisms. Recently, there has been a renewed focus in understanding how value-based calculations are made on the level of the nervous system, i.e., when decisions are made under conflicting circumstances, and the most desirable choice must be selected by weighing the costs and benefits for each behavioral choice. This article reviews samples from the current literature on anti-predator decision making in invertebrates, from single neurons to complex behaviors. Recent progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying value-based behavioral decisions is also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 190 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Master 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 42 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 37%
Neuroscience 36 18%
Psychology 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 47 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,286,709
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,705
of 11,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,752
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#60
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.