The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making Data Sharing Count: A Publication-Based Solution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2013.00009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski, Daniel S. Margulies, Michael P. Milham |
| Abstract |
The neuroimaging community has been increasingly called up to openly share data. Although data sharing has been a cornerstone of large-scale data consortia, the incentive for the individual researcher remains unclear. Other fields have benefited from embracing a data publication form - the data paper - that allows researchers to publish their datasets as a citable scientific publication. Such publishing mechanisms both give credit that is recognizable within the scientific ecosystem, and also ensure the quality of the published data and metadata through the peer review process. We discuss the specific challenges of adapting data papers to the needs of the neuroimaging community, and we propose guidelines for the structure as well as review process. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 27% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Librarian | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 21 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#873,602
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#374
of 11,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,663
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#12
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.