The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: a model of auditory deafferentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2013.00124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda, Pablo Barrios |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 20 | 21% |
| Engineering | 19 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,631
of 11,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,308
of 295,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#191
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.