↓ Skip to main content

Delegation to automaticity: the driving force for cognitive evolution?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
17 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delegation to automaticity: the driving force for cognitive evolution?
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00090
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. Shine, R. Shine

Abstract

The ability to delegate control over repetitive tasks from higher to lower neural centers may be a fundamental innovation in human cognition. Plausibly, the massive neurocomputational challenges associated with the mastery of balance during the evolution of bipedality in proto-humans provided a strong selective advantage to individuals with brains capable of efficiently transferring tasks in this way. Thus, the shift from quadrupedal to bipedal locomotion may have driven the rapid evolution of distinctive features of human neuronal functioning. We review recent studies of functional neuroanatomy that bear upon this hypothesis, and identify ways to test our ideas.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Other 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 22%
Neuroscience 16 15%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#825,432
of 26,558,784 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#353
of 11,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,289
of 243,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.