↓ Skip to main content

A neurochemical closed-loop controller for deep brain stimulation: toward individualized smart neuromodulation therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A neurochemical closed-loop controller for deep brain stimulation: toward individualized smart neuromodulation therapies
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Grahn, Grant W. Mallory, Obaid U. Khurram, B. Michael Berry, Jan T. Hachmann, Allan J. Bieber, Kevin E. Bennet, Hoon-Ki Min, Su-Youne Chang, Kendall H. Lee, J. L. Lujan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 181 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 20%
Neuroscience 31 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Chemistry 9 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#17,993,443
of 26,325,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,431
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,157
of 243,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#76
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,325,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.