↓ Skip to main content

Urinary oxytocin positively correlates with performance in facial visual search in unmarried males, without specific reaction to infant face

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urinary oxytocin positively correlates with performance in facial visual search in unmarried males, without specific reaction to infant face
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2014.00217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsuko Saito, Hiroki Hamada, Takefumi Kikusui, Kazutaka Mogi, Miho Nagasawa, Shohei Mitsui, Takashi Higuchi, Toshikazu Hasegawa, Kazuo Hiraki

Abstract

The neuropeptide oxytocin plays a central role in prosocial and parental behavior in non-human mammals as well as humans. It has been suggested that oxytocin may affect visual processing of infant faces and emotional reaction to infants. Healthy male volunteers (N = 13) were tested for their ability to detect infant or adult faces among adult or infant faces (facial visual search task). Urine samples were collected from all participants before the study to measure the concentration of oxytocin. Urinary oxytocin positively correlated with performance in the facial visual search task. However, task performance and its correlation with oxytocin concentration did not differ between infant faces and adult faces. Our data suggests that endogenous oxytocin is related to facial visual cognition, but does not promote infant-specific responses in unmarried men who are not fathers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 32%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,151
of 9,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,285
of 228,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#81
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.