↓ Skip to main content

Multiple brain networks contribute to the acquisition of bias in perceptual decision-making

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple brain networks contribute to the acquisition of bias in perceptual decision-making
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mei-Yen Chen, Koji Jimura, Corey N. White, W. Todd Maddox, Russell A. Poldrack

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 30%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 29%
Neuroscience 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Computer Science 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,930,751
of 26,558,784 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,006
of 11,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,888
of 273,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#15
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.