Title |
Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state: six recommendations to avoid common pitfalls
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2015.00136 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne-Marie Brouwer, Thorsten O. Zander, Jan B. F. van Erp, Johannes E. Korteling, Adelbert W. Bronkhorst |
Abstract |
Estimating cognitive or affective state from neurophysiological signals and designing applications that make use of this information requires expertise in many disciplines such as neurophysiology, machine learning, experimental psychology, and human factors. This makes it difficult to perform research that is strong in all its aspects as well as to judge a study or application on its merits. On the occasion of the special topic "Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state" we here summarize often occurring pitfalls and recommendations on how to avoid them, both for authors (researchers) and readers. They relate to defining the state of interest, the neurophysiological processes that are expected to be involved in the state of interest, confounding factors, inadvertently "cheating" with classification analyses, insight on what underlies successful state estimation, and finally, the added value of neurophysiological measures in the context of an application. We hope that this paper will support the community in producing high quality studies and well-validated, useful applications. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 233 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 23% |
Researcher | 43 | 18% |
Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
Other | 38 | 16% |
Unknown | 51 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 42 | 17% |
Computer Science | 42 | 17% |
Psychology | 34 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 26 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 11% |
Unknown | 61 | 25% |